umm are you saying pentax should stick with current
"one model" DSLR strategy and never offer a range
of DSLR with different specs and features? I say
if they continue to do that they will be out of
business in no time and ALL pentax lenses not just
half of them will become "obsolete".
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 9:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Re: How Pentax Could Survive


Sure, and I mostly look at the pictures instead and find that the 1Ds mkII
wouldn't make much of a difference.

Anyone (with enough money) GET TO BUY a 1Ds mkII. The only difference is
that some of you insist on having the "Pentax" trademark on it.  I stick to
Pentax because I think compact, good primes with large aperture are more
important to my photography than full frame, many pixels and pictures per
second.  If I though anything else I'd have another trademark on them.

I just don't see why you make such a fuzz about it.  If you could afford the
1Ds mkII (or Pentax equivalent) an extra lens or two wouldn't make much of a
price difference...

DagT

> fra: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> HAVE TO BUY more something expensive or GET TO BUY something more 
> useful ? Its all in how you look at it dude.... jco
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> So being a photographer is easy, you just have to buy more expencive 
> equipment? I'd better buy a 1Ds MkII then... .-)
> 
> DagT
>  
> > fra: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > place these new images side by side with some 30 year old shots and
> > you will
> > see why such old shots aren't publishable any longer. i have birding
books
> 
> > from the late 60's to 70's. amazing for their time, completely
> unpublishable
> > today because they don't meet today's standards for sharpness, let 
> > alone
> > content. this guy is an amateur and there are now thousands of people
like
> 
> > him out there producing similar images. that's the difference that
> > technology makes.
> > 
> > Herb....
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 11:04 AM
> > Subject: Re: How Pentax Could Survive
> > 
> > 
> > > Manual film advance would be difficult, but sequences like this 
> > > were regularly taken with manually focused, manual exposure movie 
> > > cameras for
> 
> > > about 75 years.  It's amazing how quickly skills are forgotten, 
> > > let
> alone
> > > lost.  The fact that this was done with a still camera is just 
> > > about
> > > amazing. (But I though that the first time I saw it).
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to