From: "J. C. O'Connell" > - well after all this > discussion than WHAT IS IT? if you want to say I need > more evidence fine but I think it then behooves > you to first EVEN COME WITH A GOOD REASON
That's a question for the Pentax engineers to answer. All I can do is speculate that the missing parts you're complaining about may have interfered with some other mechanical or electronic function of the camera. You absolutely refuse to consider that possibility. > Secondly - Your last statement is beyond > credibility because the right tool for > the job might be a K/M lens that isnt > even available new anymore in FA mount Which K/M lenses do you have that don't have a modern equivalent? > You simply don't understand the full > issues here. I suggest you open your > mind a little and spend some time > trying to come up with a good reason > for Pentax to be doing this. I told you several times. We don't know what went on in the Pentax engineering spaces. Without that knowledge there's no way of knowing why they made that decision. There may be a very good technical reason for it. It is a possibility that you refuse to even consider. Tom Reese
