William - this reply was not to you. If you read what it was in response to you would know that he specifically said it might be technicallyu impossible. that was the scope of it. we were not talking about cost issues we were talking about compatability issues ONLY.
Are you saying that its technically impossible to for Pentax to build a DSLR with full lens support of K/M and the later series? Secondly are you saying that its financailly impossible even if it were technically possible even in a higher price model? jco -----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 2:23 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > MY last post proved beyond a doubt that > it is possible to build a PK DSLR > that supports ALL PK lenses at the same. > ( that's why the lense series changes > were made the way they were) > What part about it don't you get? I am > willing to discuss it but if I clearly > show you why its possible, then why > are you calling me arrogant for telling > you why and NOT accepting your invalid > premises... I didn't get to see the exploded view. Can you prove it's both possible, and a financially viable thing to do? You really need one to get the other. Pentax knows this. You don't seem to. William Robb
