"P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >But Shel, might not mind. >(I didn't think about multiplexed lines until your earlier post reminded >me).
LOL. I didn't think about Shel not minding until I read *your* post! >Mark Roberts wrote: > >>"P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>>If the circuit is on the surface of that board the line can be cut with >>>a razor blade. (I wouldn't want to attempt it even if I knew which line >>>it was). >>> >>> >> >>Yes, but since it's likely a multiplexed line, you'll eliminate all the >>segments that rely on that trace. >> >> >> >>>Mark Roberts wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>David Savage wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Wouldn't it be more a matter of disconnecting the particular >>>>>>connection to the LCD in the viewfinder? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>It's likely to be a surface mount item these days. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>And the display will consist of a single unit LED device with all the >>>>various symbols in it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
