You have got to be the dumbest person on this list. If a very long thread runs (you knew) and you join in without reading it first then you are really stupid. Because not only are you wasting time starting arguments that have already been made, you are also making replies with "FACTS" or "POINTS" that have already been possibly PROVEN WRONG earlier in the thread
****that you don't know about*** because you are too damn lazy & stupid to read and learn from the collective knowledge of all the previous thread posters. That's why you continually but your foot in your mouth and contradict yourself. You think reading is a waste of time instead of an education. That makes you beyond a dumb ass, it makes you a dumb ass who likes to prove it repeatedly to everyone by his own stupid admission. Open mouth insert foot again. Its always better to read/learn than to ignore.. That's for the truly ignorant.. SLAM DUNK PUNK. jco -----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > > Yes it may be a few hundred posts or more > but the longer the thread runs and the > later he wants to join it without reading > it first the dumber it is to do so Hey fuckface, if I am replying to a post, I am replying to that post, not the entire thread. If something in the post I am replying to has already been replied to, then what does that make the person who has posted the same thing a few times to draw out the redundant reply? A really dumb ass? William Robb
