This silliness has been revived in response to old messages that the
list burped up earlier this evening. I think we all should ignore them.
On Sep 25, 2005, at 8:15 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Stop the personal attacks on me now!
If you cant argue my posts in specific
manner you have NO RIGHT to be calling
me foolish. It only makes you look beyond
foolish to do so. ( Or should I say
cowardly? Because to call my posts foolish
without actually arguing against specific
points you arent risking the fact that
YOU may be wrong. ) It plain stereotypical
intellectual bigotry if you label as foolish
without any reasons stated or comments
quoted of mine.
Get it?
jco
-----Original Message-----
From: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 4:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Rename request
Yes, this isn't the first time he's made a complete fool of himself on
this list.
John
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 04:10:43 +0100, P. J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JCO is one of the old timers here. Bob Sullivan wrote:
Brian,
JCO was on the Yahoo Pentax Screwmount Lens list until last week.
It's a moderated list and the moderator threw him off for repeating
similar behavior to what he exhibits here. Obviously, he needed a
place to go, so we got him. Perhaps if we all wrote to the other
list
moderator,
they would take him back?
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/19/05, Brian Dipert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear list manager,
Please consider renaming this list to the jc_and_pj-discuss list.
Because,
clearly, these two individuals feel they're entitled to dominate it
with
their long-repeated, long-winded, business-naive and tiresome
opinions. You
might have a mass unsubscribe exodus if you do, but perhaps you're
already
experiencing this, and anyway the new name would more accurately
reflect
what this list has unfortunately become in recent days.
Exhibit A:
"I am not going to move on until the posts
which incorrectly explain why this was done
cease. I am not bringing it up over and over
again, I am just explaining why these wrong
"reasons" used in some arguments by those
who don't "agree" are wrong. If you don't agree
fine, I can accept that but if your argument
explaining why you don't agree is flawed
or false I am going to rebut it. That's all....
why do we have to forcefully move on? Threads die all by
themselves...."
==============================
Brian Dipert
Senior Technical Editor: Mass Storage, Multimedia (audio, displays,
2-D and
3-D graphics, and still and video imaging), PC Core Logic and
Peripherals
EDN Magazine: http://www.edn.com
My blog: http://www.edn.com/blog/400000040.html
5000 V Street
Sacramento, CA 95817
(916) 760-0159, fax (781) 734-8038
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit me at http://www.bdipert.com
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/106 - Release Date:
19/09/2005
