1. There was a comma after the gun statement. It was not a designation regarding Canada. But to that point, consider Australia.
2. Regarding certain religious speech, here's a Canada example. http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/jun/05060808.html The problem is that the apparent exemption is a generalized statement, the interpretation of which is at the whim of the enforcer. And also consider that independent religious broadcasting is illegal in Canada. Many put their transmitters on the US border so to avoid government intrusion. ================================================= KC8TKA -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
