On Sep 30, 2005, at 10:04 AM, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
I do wish they made an FA24/2 or 2.8 that wasn't huge, as
that would be an immediate choice.
Get the 24mm anyway - it's the "perfect wideangle" focal
length and the extra size is well worth adapting to. Heck,
everything under a 300mm for 35mm is a "small lens".
lol ... I rarely use much longer than a 135mm lens. And I'm only
shooting with the digital bodies. :-)
The FA*24/2 is huge, weighs a bunch; not my cup of tea.
Also, I've heard many reports that its quality with the D/DS bodies
is suspect, with CA and unsharpness wide open being a problem point.
No thanks.
Godfrey
