There's no such thing as a standard resolution for jpegs. Jpeg is just
a way of compressing an image. A lot of pubs request jpegs because they
have to depend on e-mail for delivery. The better pubs have an ftp
server, and they can handle tiffs. No publication, save perhaps a
school newsletter, would use a 72 dpi 8x10. Heck, I don't even size
that small for the web.
On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:28 PM, graywolf wrote:
Yes, and they probably print camera phone photos in their magazine
supplement. The thing here is any publication wanting high resolution
images is not going to request jpegs. The standard ppi for jpegs is
72.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Frantisek wrote:
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 5:58:15 PM, graywolf wrote:
g> As I said in another post, if they want JPEG files they probably
want g> them at 72ppi. It sounds like they normally print snapshots
in their
Huh? Either I don't understand you, or you us ;-) 72ppi in 8x10" photo
would be awfully small resolution for printing... it's like a
cameraphone!
Frantisek
