I picked up my MX last night. I heven't used that camera in over a year. The size of the viewfinder and its brightness, compared to the istD, makes me want to cry.
I know the istD viewfinder is not too bad, by current standards. But what would it take for a not full frame camera like the istD to have a similar viewfinder, in brightness and magnification? I had also forgotten how nice the MX feels in my hands... I think I'm bringing it to the PDML meet next weekend, along with a couple of rolls of Tri-X. :) j -- Juan Buhler http://www.jbuhler.com photoblog at http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
