Brilliant shots, Paul. Regards Jens Bladt Arkitekt MAA http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 1. oktober 2005 14:38 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: Advice re walk around lens Australian outback I use the Pentax DA 50-200 extensively. It's a very nice lens. I just posted a couple of PESO pics that I shot with it. These are both at f8. The first is at 200mm, the second at 160mm. I also use this lens for walkarounds when I want a little more reach than a normal length. It autofocuses very nicely and is quite compact for this focal length. I focused it manually here, because the water spray and foreground rope can sometimes fool the autofocus. I've only owned one Sigma lens, a 17-35 and found it no match for any of my Pentax glass. I replaced it with the DA 16-45. However, I don't know anything about the two Sigma lenses you've named here. Paul http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3770890&size=lg http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3770887 On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:09 AM, Charles Wilson wrote: > I am going on an outback trip in central Australia next year. > Unfortunately need to pack light so thought of taking my > > DA 14 lens > F 50 1.4 > > Now the question of zoom. > > I think my Tokina 80-200 2.8 is to heavy. > > So was thinking buying one of these > > Sigma 50 -200 3.5-5.6 > Sigma 55-200 4 - 5.6 > or > Pentax DA 50-200 4-5.6 > > Has anyone had any experience of the above lens. Which one would you > take? > > Regards > > > Charles Wilson > Sydney Australia > > >
