Must be your batteries, I find that 2500mAh AA NiMH cells equalize the
weight quite nicely.
mike wilson wrote:
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2005/10/05 Wed AM 04:59:16 GMT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
On 5 Oct 2005 at 6:48, DagT wrote:
I was referring to the fact that the 1Ds mkII is about the same size
and weight as the Pentax 67, not the use.
What gets me is (if you've been watching the *ist D grip thread) that the *ist
D sans grip is apparently too small for many people which is counter to the
general Pentax DSLRs are great because they're small discussions.
I noticed that. It's very interesting - I had hoped that the DSLR line would
be even smaller than the film SLRs, as there was no film/film transport to
accommodate. No doubt the extra batteries and electronics account for that.
Still a disappointment.
I also find that the D (not handled any of the others) is very oddly balanced.
Much heavier on the left than the right. Which is not to inject a dose of
politics into this thread. 8-)
mike
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
