Ken,
I tend to agree that this one leaves me feeling non-commital or empty. It
is definitely very abstract. I'm having a problem determining if it is a
telephoto view of the dunes or a telephoto view of some of the ripples in
the sandy creek bed that runs in front of them.
Was there numerous times as a child.
Tom C.
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PESO: Sand Pile
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:02:13 +0100
Kenneth,
I usually adore your photographs, but I just haven't been able to form an
opinion about this one. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it, and it
has the Waller trademark of being more than the sum of its considerable
parts, but somehow I just haven't been able to relate to it. I suspect I
would like to see it ten feet wide on a wall somewhere to appreciate it
properly.
John
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:33:55 +0100, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Frank & Doug, thanks for commenting.
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message ----- From: "frank theriault"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Sand Pile
On 10/3/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check out -
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Comment solicited,
what strikes you?
yea,
nay,
or indifferent
Thanks in advance for commenting.
It doesn't look like a dune to me. It doesn't really look like
anything but an abstract design, and that's even after being told what
it is.
Sure as hell is cool, though.
Yea!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
