Chopsticks make a good meal last longer!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:37 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: cultural image perception
>
>
> Even more perplexing then... :)
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
> >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: cultural image perception
> >Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:29:01 -0400
> >
> >They did use the spoon...
> >
> >Tom C wrote:
> >
> >>I know the popular story regarding chopsticks being an extension of the
> >>fingers... Really though, I just can't understand why a culture
> that used
> >>shovels to move dirt efficiently couldn't relate that to the human
> >>anatomy... I mean, if you want to dig a hole, do you go get two
> poles and
> >>manipulate them, picking up dirt between them. until the hole is dug?
> >>
> >>Tom C.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Reply-To: [email protected]
> >>>To: [email protected]
> >>>Subject: Re: cultural image perception
> >>>Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:46:14 -0400
> >>>
> >>>I've seen it claimed that the Chinese actually invented the fork, just
> >>>never adopted it as a table implement. Chopsticks worked well enough.
> >>>
> >>>Tom C wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>It may explain why they invented chopsticks... lack of
> focus... whereas
> >>>>the western world has a no-nonsense fork, knife, and spoon...
> stab the
> >>>>meat.. no slight intended... just always wondering... and
> blathering...
> >>>>
> >>>>Somewhat interesting...
> >>>>
> >>>>http://app1.chinadaily.com.cn/star/2002/0117/cu18-1.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Tom C.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>From: "Jim Colwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>Reply-To: [email protected]
> >>>>>To: "pdml" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>Subject: Re: cultural image perception Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005
> 18:25:44
> >>>>>-0300
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Vic, thanks for the interesting link in "Mind the
> Chinese...".  I think
> >>>>>that
> >>>>>your post raises a wide range of cutural image perception
> issues.  For
> >>>>>me, a
> >>>>>line or series of elements with visual flow from the low
> left to high
> >>>>>right
> >>>>>in an image has a dynamic and on-going quality, while a similar
> >>>>>structure
> >>>>>going from low right to high left seems regressive.  Is this the same
> >>>>>perception as one who reads from right to left ?  Do others who read
> >>>>>from
> >>>>>left to right (as I do) have the up-and-to-the-right as
> "positive", or
> >>>>>is it
> >>>>>a consequence of math graphs with +x,+y in the upper right quadrant ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Jim
> >>>>>www.jcolwell.ca
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>When you're worried or in doubt,     Run in circles, (scream
> and shout).
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >When you're worried or in doubt,     Run in circles, (scream and shout).
> >
>
>
>


Reply via email to