Hi Markus,
Thanks for looking. I don't know what this shot might be compared to. It's just 
a funny moment, an outtake from a shoot. If the water wasn't running down her 
face and if her eyes weren't closed, I wouldn't have shown it. It's meant to be 
a smile. Last week I posted another shot from that day that I like for 
aesthetic reasons and because it's an example of intentional highlight 
overexposure. I don't have the other shots at hand,  but they're more on the 
order of jewelry pics and are probably not much fun. Here's the shot I posted 
last week:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481&msg_id=00DmID&photo_id=3778030&photo_sel_index=0


> Well commented Kenneth, I agree fully here.
> Any other shots to compare Paul?
> greetings
> Markus
> 
> 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:34 PM
> >>To: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: PESO: Mermaid
> >>
> >>
> >>Paul,
> >>two no goes for me -
> >>+ the water stream running down her face looks like her nose is leaking 
> >>+ and her eyes being closed
> >>also a vertical crop might lessen the impact of the surroundings 
> >>& accentuate the jewelery.
> >>
> >>My $.02 worth
> >>
> >>Kenneth Waller
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Subject: PESO: Mermaid
> >>
> >>An outtake from last weekend's jewelry shoot. Amy takes a dunk to get 
> >>some water on the wet suit. FA 50/1.4, f3.5@ 1/1500, ISO 200. I shot 
> >>most of the pics with a big stop to blur the background and make the 
> >>model pop.
> >>Paul
> >>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3791836&size=lg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>________________________________________
> >>PeoplePC Online
> >>A better way to Internet
> >>http://www.peoplepc.com
> >>
> 

Reply via email to