Hi William and Paul, On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:30:51 -0600, William Robb wrote:
> > And figure out something to cover the focal distance range > > I've been using the FA* 200/2.8 for. > > A nice 135/2.8 should do well. > Sad we can't get a 135/2. Geez, I should've been able to think of that! I've even got both the K135/2.5 and the "Bow Wow" Takumar 135/2.5 in the drawer right now. So how is the F or FA incarnation of the 135/2.8? TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
