Bruce, just curious... I've never used Picture Window Pro or Phase One
Capture One. Does either one stand out as being significantly easier to use
or producing better results w/less effort than Photoshop? I have PS CS2 at
present.
Tom C.
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Picture Window Pro. Was: PESO - Memorial
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:04:59 +0100
Thnaks, Bruce,
Since I posted my question, I have downloaded the trial and had a play.
It's very impressive, and far easier to get into than PS. I can see some
modest expenditure looming.
Like you, I also use Phase One Capture One, and have been astounded at what
it can do with pictures I thought were beyond redemption.
John
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:57:23 +0100, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello John,
Thanks for the comments.
With full 16 bit support, full color mangement and sophisticated
masking, so far I never use Photoshop. Not to say that PS is not a
great product, but PictureWindow Pro at about $90 is one heck of a buy
and a much better product than the other competitors of PS. I am
overall happy with it.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
