Rob Studdert wrote:
Well it could have been shot anywhere I guess but I like it though I'm sure
it'll draw mixed responses. This image is also a great example of why I love my
A16/2.8 Fisheye, the image was shot hand held on the fly but it doesn't show
it. The colour was pretty bad as it was mixed tungsten + sunlight illumination
but in the B&W conversion I think I've preserved the subtleties of the light.
In any case I'd appreciate commentary on this image and it will be my last for
a while (I promise). The image is pretty much as shot but for the B&W and
rectilinear conversions and a very slight rotation and minor crop, oh and yes I
will clone it out but I didn't have time :-)
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP4316s.jpg (~200kB)
Tech: *ist D, ISO400, 1/125s A16/2.8 FE @ f3.2
Comments, questions and critiques encouraged.
Gasp! That couldn't _possibly_ be a 16mm fisheye!
It's not distorted, you see... And why not?
keith
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
