Plasma TV is just NICE to have. Could be substituted by a home cinema projector
any day.
Pentax photographic equipment, otoh, is NEED to have.
Simple as that.
Wish I had a canoe, though...
Jostein
(insert smileys as appropriate)
Quoting Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You think we're rich? Country Club, yacht? I don't golf and the biggest
> boat I'll ever own is probably what I have now, a 17 ft canoe.
>
> Of course the answer to the earlier question... need? Of course not. I
> don't need 2/3 or more of what I have. I don't even NEED my first SLR, the
> MX. I could still have only the Kenwood component system I bought in 1981
> (which I still use and is beautifully simple and elegant)... but that
> doesn't seem to be the way in western capitalist societies...
>
> BTW, both my cars were purchased used...
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
> From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: BAD NEWS: Pentax +Samsung DSLRs
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:54:31 -0400
>
> You don't think these guys are going to buy a $200 TV. Why they would be
> laughed out of their country club, and the yacht club would sink their boat
> (sorry, 200 meter yacht).
>
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> -----------------------------------
>
>
>
> Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, keith_w wrote:
> >
> >>But, all that 's beside the original point. This particular conversation
> >>isn't about watching TV, it's supposed to be about the horrid cost of
> >>television receivers today, regardless of the end use to which it's put.
> >
> >
> >Yes, what happened to CRTs? Do you need that expensive stuff?
> >
> >Kostas
> >
> >
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
