Bob Blakely wrote: > From: "Tom Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > The law does not offer protection of peoples' privacy. There is no such > > right guaranteed in any government document. I would rather take > > responsponsibility for my own safety and live freely than live in a state > > where police are a bigger threat than the criminals. > > In this country, the United States that is, the 4th Amendment to this > Constitution states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, > houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, > shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, > supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to > be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." This is your basic > right to privacy.
Whoa, you misunderstood the context of what I said. My "right to privacy" statement was in response to Eleanor's statement that the guy taking pictures was violating peoples privacy. My statement meant "anyone in public is subject to having their picture taken." I have been arguing against abuse of the 4th amendment rights. Tom Reese Tom Reese
