On 17 Oct 2005 at 18:28, William Robb wrote: > Apparently, according to Janet Reno, no nudity is required to hit the child > pornography definition. > > But if we publish it, we are in deep doodoo. > > It makes us careful.
So what about that weird kids glamour site link that was posted to the list a couple of months back (the one where they all had alien eyes and boofy hairdoos). Where would that fall? Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
