On Tuesday, October 18, 2005, at 09:39 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
That's still vague, unless all the bits that shouldn't be depicted are listed and which particular combinations these bits are deemed to constitute sexual activity simulated or otherwise then it's just someones opinion at the time.
I fully agree, Rob. But that's the wording used in US law. I'll quote myself, as I said in one of my books:"Pornography is in the eye (and mind) of the beholder. The photograph acts only as a mirror."
Bob
