I've heard that the M and K were both very good, and that the M doesn't
give up much if anything to the K. That said I don't have
a K version of this lens but I like the M very much.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Whats the concensus on the the K35/2 and M35/2?
jco
-----Original Message-----
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 5:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Which 35/2.0?
Hi,
Thanks for your comments. Considering the price, the 31/Ltd had better be
a LOT better than the FA35/2.0 At this point my inclination is to go for
the FA35/2.0. Were the Ltd a lot smaller, I might be tempted, but the big
price combined with the big size doesn't push my buttons..
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I can compare the FA35/2 against the A35/2.8 and FA31/1.8. All three
are very good, but the A35/2.8 is some distance behind the two FAs in
performance. The FA31 is just a hair better performer, with better
OOF rendering, than the FA35, but the edge is very slight and expensive.
I didn't like the FA31's built in hood, size, weight, etc. where the
FA35 is wonderfully compact and light.
I don't know anything else in the 35mm range that's faster than the
FA35/2 AL.
Godfrey
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
