I will answer all posts that interest me, regardless of topic.
I judge for myself what side folks are on, their biases, personalities and which folks they wish to stifle by which posts they object to. Most of us do, even if we are not consciously aware of it. I'm just putting this in print. You objected to my post. You did not object to the post that spurred my response, nor did you choose to post objection to both.
Regards, Bob... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll become happy; if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher. - Socrates From: "Frantisek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 3:55:53 PM, Bob wrote: BB> In these days people in Iraq are regarded as an most significant by BB> Americans, but this is irrelevant. Yes this is irrelevant to the subject of laws on improper photography. Please be careful with the issue of Iraq, les it turns into a flaming thread. Or if you want to discuss it, why don't you start another thread? I have plenty of arguments different to your view, however nicely you phrase it, but I guess it would be pointless between us two. So let's please get back to at least the issue of laws on photography, could we? Frantisek
