I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. The last batch of prints I had made were about 11x15 or so, which seems to be about 100% Unless I can generate prints of that size with the quality that I demand, a lens, and, in fact, digital, is of not much value to me. I've not yet made any prints from the istDS because my skills with the camera and the raw converter are still pretty poor. However, I'm soon going to have to take the plunge.
Your tests are valuable and your time and effort genuinely appreciated. Thanks! Shel > [Original Message] > From: Jarek Dabrowski > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > 5) the 18-55 is not a bad performer; it just isn't quite > > as good as the others. > > Well, I think it can easily compete with 20-35/4, > nobody is inspecting photos at 100%. It is maybe > a bit worse than 20-35, but for sure not 4 > times worse as the price is :)
