Thanks for looking, Jens. Of course a bank robber wouldn't wear
earrings. That's the point. It's meant to be absurd. Since the earring
is obviously out of place, it stands out. The idea of the campaign is
that the jewelry is too nice to cover up. In the earlier execution, the
model wore a wet suit with a hole cut in it to reveal a necklace.
On Oct 23, 2005, at 4:51 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Would a disguised bank robber ware viusible ear rings?
Otherwise a very nice picture. I do agree about the orange part on the
barrel.
Regards
Jens Bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. oktober 2005 22:35
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: A nervous shoot
Yes, I did remove my reflection from the sunglasses. Excellent idea on
the gun barrel. Will do. Thanks much.
Paul
On Oct 23, 2005, at 4:21 PM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
I really like the second one.
Question: Did you remove your reflection from the sun glasses?
Suggestion: Clone out the red stripe on the gun barrel. And perhaps
clone
the sky reflection around the end of the gun barrel to have it stand
out more.
Powell
I shot another pic for a jewelry ad today. It's a low-budget
operation,
so I did it without permits or permissions. When you see the subject,
you'll know why it made both me and the model a bit nervous. Her
fiance
held up a big sign that said PHOTO SHOOT, and we worked very fast.
But
I did manage to get off about a dozen shots, and I'm happy with the
results. The first one is probably quite a bit better for the ad. The
second one might be more fun. All with the *istD and the FA50/1.4,
ISO
400, f5.6@ !/90th.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3822906&size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3822917&size=lg
Paul Stenquist
