Thanks Frank. Yeah, the jewelry is a small part of the image. The headline, tag line, and a copy line will have to help carry it for an idea like this to work. Paul
> On 10/23/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I shot another pic for a jewelry ad today. It's a low-budget operation, > > so I did it without permits or permissions. When you see the subject, > > you'll know why it made both me and the model a bit nervous. Her fiance > > held up a big sign that said PHOTO SHOOT, and we worked very fast. But > > I did manage to get off about a dozen shots, and I'm happy with the > > results. The first one is probably quite a bit better for the ad. The > > second one might be more fun. All with the *istD and the FA50/1.4, ISO > > 400, f5.6@ !/90th. > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3822906&size=lg > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3822917&size=lg > > > > > > i lik the first one best. she looks more impersonal and cold-blooded. > > my biggest problem is that i really didn't think she was wearing > jewellery. i thought the thing hanging from her ear was an i-pod > ear-bud <g>. > > -frank > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >
