Sorry David. 
On my screen I get the whole image, a half inch high stripe isn't much to
look at. 
I'm using IE 6.029

BTW. The same goes for many panoes other have submitted :-(

Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds 
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25. oktober 2005 13:23
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PESO: Perth Pano (Whoops, wrong link)
> 
> Scroll side to side. It's too long to fit on the screen.
> 
> Dave
> 
> On 10/25/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi David,
> > I'd love to see this, but the thumbnail is too small to get much of a
> > feel for it. When I click, I get only a huge blowup of a small section
> > of the pano.
> > Paul
> > On Oct 25, 2005, at 6:52 AM, David Savage wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I meant to post the link to the smaller thumbnail page:
> > >
> > > http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_014.htm
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > On 10/25/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> G'day Folks,
> > >>
> > >> Yesterday after work I intended to go down  to the harbor to watch
> the
> > >> sunset, but I missed my turn (ask Rob how good I am at navigating :-
> ).
> > >> Sooo, instead of doubling back I just kept on going until I hit
> Perth.
> > >>
> > >> I had no real intention of taking pictures but when I got there the
> > >> light was doing interesting things, so I though what the hey! I shot
> a
> > >> series with the intention of making a 360 degree pano. Here's the
> > >> result:
> > >>
> > >> <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/KP_001_CRS.jpg>
> > >>
> > >> 18 shots, original size its 28835x2894 pixels. It's a little dark in
> > >> some areas, PS was crawling last night so I didn't even try making
> any
> > >> shadow & highlights adjustments, but it's a pretty accurate record of
> > >> the light at the time.
> > >>
> > >> Comments, thoughts & criticisms all welcome.
> > >>
> > >> Dave
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> 




Reply via email to