Gee, I thought the 300/4 for the 67 was basically the same lens as the
K-300/4 with a different mount. I never had a problem lifting or holding
that. Now Ken's 600mm Bazooka, that would be a bit of a problem
handholding.
A 300 on the 67 is about the same magnification as a 135 on a 35mm camera.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Do you have a gym membership? I think I'll have to join.
Brother D
Just consider the 300 as training for the 600!
Kenneth Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sent the Dark Side to My Brother
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Dave wrote:
Now if he needs 40 fps etc then he needs to upgrade to the Canons
or Nikons. I amd very satisfied with my istD as a "steath camera.
People run when they see the 70-200VR with 1.7b tele.
I just got my 300mm f4 for my 6x7 and I suspect folks will
scatter when that combo comes out of the bag, up to the eye,
and aimed in their general direction! !8^D
(KEH sent me a pristine SuperTakumar 300mm f4 in m42 by
mistake first go-round)
Brother Bill
Me too, Brother Bill,
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7554560888&ssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBSA:AU:11
http://tinyurl.com/d9aan
Do you have a gym membership? I think I'll have to join.
Brother D
