David, can you show us a pic of the bag?
All I see are the Adventure 2, 8, 74 and 75.
Which is it most like?

Thanks
Don

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Oswald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 5:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Bag enablement
> 
> 
> On a recent trip, one of my Tamrac bags gave out.  I have several, but 
> this one was the only one that could be carried comfortably, yet with 
> enough room for body, four lenses (included mounted lens), flash, 
> batteries, etc.  But unlike most Tamrac bags, this one was a cheapie and 
> I've been waiting for a good reason to upgrade.  With a split out seam, 
> broken buckle, and broken zipper pull all within a few days of each 
> other, it's time.
> 
> I replaced it with a Tamrac Adventure 3 photo-pack.  I just wanted to 
> offer my assessment.
> 
> It snugly accommodates (almost exactly) the following gear:
> 
> Inside:
>    *ist-DS body
>    AF-330FTZ flash
>    SMCP-DA 16-45 f/4 ED AL
>    SMCP-FA 50mm f/1.4
>    SMCP-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 IF AL
>    SMCP-FA 135mm f/2.8 IF
>    Spare batteries
>    Spare SD media
>    Cell phone
>    Other assorted small things like lens cloth, pen, etc.
>    Three hard hoods (nested) and a flash diffuser.
> 
> Strapped to back:
>    Ten inch (when extended) tripod
> 
> Strapped to sides via Tamrac's Modular system:
>    Pouch with SMCP-FA 80-320mm f/4.5-5.6
>    Pouch with water bottle
> 
> 

Reply via email to