LOL! Yep, I trashed that photo. My smell checker missed that stinker.
Meant composed of course.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
graywolf wrote:
Just to put this stuff into perspective. With my first camera I took a
photo of water flowing over a dam under a bridge. I had to have a
buddy hold my legs while hanging upside down. I deliberately composted
it at a 45 degree angle as that is the way I thought it looked best. I
took the film to my neighborhood drugstore for processing, as we all
did back in the early '50's. They did not even print the negative!
I raised so much hell about it that my Dad gave me a darkroom outfit
for my Birthday that year, which is how I happened to get interested
in serious photography. So, in a way, you guys can blame that
drugstore for your having to put up with me.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
Clerk: Out of 36 shots, 10 were out of focus, 15 were blurry, you
accidently took three pictures of the floor, you had tilted
horizons in two others and the other six were mediocre compositions."
geez, that's a pretty good roll by my standards...
But you'd have to explain to the clerk why you only wanted prints of the
15 blurry ones! (and maybe the three of the floor...)
