On 31 Oct 2005 at 22:01, graywolf wrote: > Well, I guess I am pretty close, considering I have not calibrated this > thing in a couple of months. Some very faint color in the dark set. So I > am close to but not exactly at 2.2.
Good to hear. > BTW, Martin Fielding, the author of Adobe Photoshop PS2 for > Photographers, says that the only reason Apple uses 1.8 is because the > b&w monitor in the original Mac was only barely able to get that high. > He says he uses 2.2 with his Mac's and recommends it. Says that 1.8 is > obsolete. Of course that goes directly against what the guy says on the > site you gave a link to. Just goes to show that opinions abound, I > guess; just like people who think their own opinion is "TRUTH" incarnate > <GRIN>. Yes, I saw that, I don't agree with his reasoning, I run everything G2.2, I had been producing G1.8 profiles at one stage but don't bother now. If an image is embedded with an industry standard colour profile then any decent imaging application should understand it and render the image as intended. Anything else I assume is sRGB which is of course G2.2. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
