Lesser build, no AF-C in all modes, no commander flash, no battery grip,
no PC Sync, most settings via menu rather than direct controls, no
analogue meter readout.
You gain a bigger buffer (on the DS/DS2 only), bigger LCD, spot white
balance and a slightly higher flash sync.
They are less camera than the D, but the DS/DS2 especially are more than
enough camera for most.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
There are some who might consider the DS and the DS2 to be the equal of the
D, and perhaps in some ways superior. Why do you say that the other D
cameras "are less camera than the D?"
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
[Original Message]
From: Tom C
The problem now is the D is almost 2 years old, and the D(eviants) are
less
camera than the D.
