On 8/11/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed: >It clearly doesn't look fine as presented to at least two people. Are you >saying you didn't notice any of the things I mentioned in the pic as posted?
I did notice them actually, but there as there is no 'standard' for the file size of a displayed web image, there is no reference for a web image to be judged by, except one's own personal taste. Personally i would not display a web image like that at anything less than 50kb and more likely around 100 kb, but I do have plenty of web space. Others may not, or may not wish to for various reasons. When looking at web images, I take with a pinch of salt such things as detail, colour, luminance. These things can only be an approximation of the intent of the photographer. I do the best I can with my web images, but to be honest, if anyone wants to see the real thing, come see some prints! I'll supply the drinks ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
