On 9 Nov 2005 at 17:44, William Robb wrote: > I suspect that was Rob's point. I know for a fact I have missed a number of > pictures because of the small, slow buffer.
It's like the fish that got away there's never proof, IOW a lost image can never be regained it's most painful for me when I'm, shooting concerts and panos, I never seem to need quite the buffer depth when shooting motor sports even crashes, a deeper buffer would be nice though. Specifically WRT pano shooing because there is no practical full frame fisheye solution for the Pentax DSLRs any immersive pano will require more than seven shots, so out the window goes any midst of the action photo options such as "Springwood Foundation Day" at http://4020.net/bmvr/#springfnd Now that's street photography :-) Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
