That's a PS issue, or more likely a PSP issue. My offhand guess is that
PSP is not honouring the embedded colour profile. Convert them to sRGB
and you should be good to go. Or send them as PSD's, which PSP should be
able to read.
-Adam
Don Williams wrote:
I didn't know that -- what a chump! I should have checked. But I have
one further problem. The RAW files can be converted in Photoshop easily
and further processed -- but when I convert (to TIFF) and send them to
my co-worker and he opens them with Paint Shop Pro -- they look like
something 'gone wrong' in ImageJ. They are useless -- to be precise.
Don
Adam Maas wrote:
RAW should be better than TIFF. The file sizes are around 2/3rds the
size of a TIFF on the D. It's JPEG that picks up a performance boost
due to small file sizes.
-Adam
Don Williams wrote:
For my work rather important. I've been taking series of pictures of
dynamic events and after about four pictures the camera needs to
unload the buffer into the card. This interrupts the record and there
is a gap in the data. A faster card may make all the difference. I'm
using TIFF and would prefer to use RAW -- but this would be quite
impossible.
Don
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
Just wanted to know, based in your experience, how
important is the speed of memory cards (SD) and how it
affects camera's performance.
Regards
Albano Garcia
Photography & Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC
Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
- Re: Speed of memory cards... Adam Maas
-
