Getting close can harm the animals. It may give away their location to 
predators or prey, cause stress, disrupt feeding and lead to abandonment of 
nests or young.



> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> > You should read this month's Lenswork interview with Nick Grant  regarding 
> > his wildlife photos from Africa. He uses a Pentax 6x7  camera and gets in 
> > CLOSE. Patience and a tolerance for letting the  world do as it might is 
> > essential. His wildlife photos are the only  ones I've seen in recent 
> > years that really do the subject justice, to  my eye. All these "fit a 
> > 600mm telephoto and bang a hundred shots off  in 10 seconds" pictures are 
> > boring. His technique allows the intimate  expression of the animals to 
> > surface.
> 
> So I had to check out Nick Grant..  errr Brandt to see what he's all about.
> http://www.nickbrandt.com/
> 
> I agree with you about getting close to the subjects and I try to do this in 
> my own nature (bird) photography.  After looking at Brandt's photos, I must 
> say that you and I have VERY different ideas about photography and "doing 
> the subjects justice"  I don't like his technique at all.  I hate the soft 
> edges; it reminds me of glamour photos with a soft filter/lens.  The soft 
> focus (or post processing; whatever it is) ruins otherwise very nice 
> closeups/portraits.  I DO like the framing and composition of his wider 
> shots.  In my opinion he is trying too hard to make his photos look 
> "vintage" and that bothers me; it isn't "genuine" and it makes it look like 
> he is trying to be something that he is not.  Except for the wide shots 
> showing the animals and the sweeping vistas of their environment, it doesn't 
> (in my opinion) do them any justice.
> 
> Christian
>  
> 

Reply via email to