Or you just might be wrong, that's a third and most likely possibility because it wouldn't make any sense to do be doing those things. interlacing doesn't distort or crop which is very different animal.. -----Original Message----- From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 9:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Modern PC hardware, Was: Re: Full Frame
Well, given that Uncompressed HD is 1920x1200 and 1080i is 1920x1080, they must be doing one of the two (note that they're also interlacing the signal at the same time, since straight uncompressed HD is also Progressive-Scan) -Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: >I don't follow that logic. you cant downconvert >1920x1200 to 1920x1080(HDTV) without either cropping >or stretching, neither of which would be acceptable. >jco > >-----Original Message----- >From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 9:11 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Modern PC hardware, Was: Re: Full Frame > > >1080i is downconverted from 1920x1200, which is what uncompressed HD >is, >one of the big advantages of the 23" panels is they display uncompressed >HD pixel-for-pixel. There's a reason I specified uncompressed HD. > >You are correct about the pixel format, I got old-fashioned NTSC mixed >up with HD for a second. > >-Adam > > > >
