Heck, my digital has a 5x equivalency factor. That must mean it is
better than a DSLR <GRIN>.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 12 Nov 2005 at 17:42, Christian wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lenses are more used than wide
I expect that for most users, partial fram DSLR cameras are an advantage.
Certainly for me. The "extra" 1.5x (or whatever) reach is a plus for
shooting birds. It's like a built in TC without losing a stop of light.
Surely a 2x crop sensor would be better again? :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
