On Nov 15, 2005, at 10:17 AM, Jostein wrote:

Thanks for commenting, Godfrey.

I tried your HSV suggestion, and I agree it looks a lot better. You may have solved a recurring issue for me there!

Glad that worked out to your liking.

Concerning the colour space, I have many bad experiences with sRGB for web. It may be something I do wrong, I don't know... -But embedding the Adobe profile has given more consistent results for me...

Hmm. Are you using the "Convert to..." colorspace command, choosing sRGB? It makes no difference for browsers that are actually honoring the ICC profile (Internet Explorer and Safari do on Mac OS X, I don't know about others), but so many people use poorly calibrated monitors and browsers that don't honor the embedded ICC profile that sRGB is usually a better rough estimate.

Godfrey


----- Original Message ----- From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 2:34 AM
Subject: Re: PESO: Forest interior


On Oct 15, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Jostein wrote:

http://www.oksne.net/paw/stitched_skoginterior.html

Lovely composition.

I notice that you posted it with an Adobe RGB (1998) profile embedded; you'd probably do better to convert it to sRGB (and embed the sRGB tag) for web posting.

It is a bit too blue, although I agree that light in the forest can be bluish. An HSV adjustment layer and desaturating in the Cyans by 50% cleans it up beautifully.

Godfrey


Reply via email to