Ralf R. Radermacher wrote: > Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Had a special set of lenses made up for that without the variable >>diopter. > > > Same here. > > Things have gotten a little odd with my no-line glasses and cameras, > over the last months. > > All my viewfinders are blurry unless I look into them from a distance of > about 3 to 4 inches. Sole exception: an old Kiev 60 prism that used to > be blurry before now is tack-sharp. The former one that worked well for > years now doesn't. > > Now, with the LX's diopter correction set to '0', things are reasonably > sharp again from a normal viewing distance. > > I take it normal camera viewfinders - the non-adjustable ones - do have > a slightly negative value as their standard setting. > > Now, is there someone around here who can make any sense of all this? > > Further info: I am far-sighted and my eyes have lost practically all of > their close-focussing ability over the last few years. > > Ralf >
With my MX I am using an eyepiece that has an option to put a lens in it. Here is it: http://static.flickr.com/27/64386373_2497575731_o.jpg I do not know if it was designed for pentax viewfinder but it fits nicely and helps me a lot in focusing. luben -- "Computers are useless. They can only give answers." - Pablo Picasso
