I'm a meany. I don't like waste. I can
use them in the flashes until they die.
D
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:42, Don Williams wrote:
Okay. So I make my exposure with no light. Then, automatically, the
camera makes another. The second would be the same, since the first
was taken with absolutely no light; one is subtracted from the other
-- leaving what?
Well, ideally - nothing. The camera didn't know you were taking a
picture of nothing, so it's just doing what it's told.
If you turn of the automatic noise reduction you will get camera
response back right away after the exposure - AND you will see just how
amazingly noisy a multi-minute exposure at high ISO looks. It ain't
pretty.
By the way, the new camera has not yet arrived. The agents are waiting
for a shipment and will send it next week. I am to send this one back
in the same box. The six volt battery has been running the camera
since I mentioned it had arrived and reads 5.8 volts. The La Crosse
charger, which arrived yesterday, is trying to bring back a set of
NiCads to life that may be beyond resurrection. They were almost new
(unused) but a few years old.
NiCads? In this day of high-capacity no-memory-effect NiMH batteries,
why would you even be bothering with trying to resurrect NiCads - unless
you're just trying to prove that it can be done?
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
--No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.3/174 - Release Date: 17/11/2005
--
Dr E D F Williams
_______________________________
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
Updated: Print Gallery -- 16 11 2005
