Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Supposedly they did. The real question is "If they had been *prevented* >> from taking pictures, how would that have helped us or hindered them?" >> Whenever I hear of photographers being hassled because they might >> terrorists I think, "OK, suppose I *am* a terrorist. Now I have a >> picture of the Brooklyn Bridge! (for example) Hooray! Now I can... well, >> I can.... I mean I'm gonna... erm, ahh... give it to a voodoo witch >> doctor to stick pins into?" > >Mark, let me remind you that I was stopped and questioned (having to >pull out my Israel passport) in London just because I photographed some >darn stupid road sign that was adjoint to the residence of ambassador of >my own country... So, let's just say that's not the only case...
I'm not denying that it happens. Only that it's rational or effective. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
