Speaking of monitors - I have a question - I am
thinking of changing my existing 17" HP monitor. 
Actually, I am planning to change my complete
computer.  I, however, am thinking this time I won't
buy the 'readily available' kit at all these
electronics shops.  I want to buy a good quality
monitor.  

Which is the real good one ?
What is the criteria ?
To what extent CRT and LCD matters ?

My use - well, lot of photography (amateur, of course)
and obviously my family members will use it for their
regular browsing on net etc etc ...

Thanks in advance.

Anand

--- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Make sure you buy something NEW - not used.
> I have been absolutely delighted with these 
> DELL P991s CRTs I got off ebay. They are super
> trinitions
> 19" (18" viewable). They can be found on ebay
> at very reasonable prices now...
> jco
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 1:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: OT: Cheap Monitor
> 
> 
> I have a HP Pavilion, with a 17" quite decent
> monitor (actually I am not
> sure 
> it's a 15", but not quite sure how to measure it).
> Only I've had both for 
> about, hmmm, four years. I've been told/read the HP
> monitors are actually 
> Trinitron.
> 
> I've been quite happy with the monitor. Only now the
> horizontal hold is 
> going. Actually, not sure what it is called. It's
> not exactly vertical hold,
> but 
> sometimes boxes coming up on the screen (dialog box
> type of things), the
> right 
> side of the box it is not always straight. It curves
> in and out a bit. I
> keep 
> adjusting the horizontal stretch part of my monitor
> and that straightens it
> up 
> for a bit.
> 
> But it means it is going to get worse. No point in
> having it fixed, since 
> some monitors are really cheap now. Only I was
> looking on the Net and LCDs
> are 
> selling better. 
> 
> Personally, for extended use, not just doing
> photography, but programming, 
> using word processing/spread sheets, I prefer a CRT.
> It seems much easier on
> my 
> eyes. LCDs, to my eyes, don't have enough "depth."
> 
> And a lot of LCDs are expensive. The ones that may
> be easier on the eyes
> are, 
> anyway.
> 
> This CRT at Circuit City seems okay.
>
http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/HP-Monitor-MX705-/sem/rpsm/oid/126673/catOid/
> -1
> 2965/rpem/ccd/productDetail.do
> 
> But I also want to get something decent for
> processing digital photographs. 
> It would probably be fine, because my current HP
> monitor is fine. And I use
> my 
> monitor for a lot more than processing photographs,
> photography probably
> works 
> out to only 10-20% of my use. Or less.
> 
> Just wondering if anyone has that particular model,
> or has some other 
> recommendation. 
> 
> Also looks like if I want a CRT I better move quick,
> because they seem to be
> 
> disappearing.
> 
> Marnie aka Doe 
> 
> 
> 



        
                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to