I'm very happy using RSP, the pay version of RSE. Only thing I'm missing is a tool for CA correction. Quality is good, the tests are good too, and I find it intuitive (despite no conventional menus).
Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Jack Isidore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20. november 2005 16:36 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Which RAW converter? > > Rob, > > I will try this. I should have a kodak grey card somewhere. I guess I > have to shoot this greycard under controlled lighting with the > different camera white balance settings. Convert it to neutral gray in > Adobe RAW and save the profile. Correct me if i'm wrong? > > Jack > > What you are missing is that the Adobe RAW converter WB settings are > generic > > and the ones in the Pentax software (or as shot in PCR) are the same as > in > > camera. > > > > If you wish to have all the in camera WB setting replicated in PCR then > shoot > > at each of the WB settings and when you open each file in PCR save the > settings > > subset White Balance then you will be able to replicate any in-camera > preset. > > In all other regards the Pentax convertor offers no comparison to PCR. >
