Good advice ... sometimes I'm too direct or focused on what I think the
photo (or anything) should be.  It's a bad habit from my childhood,
instilled by an over-domineering, abusive mother and too absent father,
coupled with an underlying level of low self .  In my weak defense it
should be noted that I sent Frank a private e-mail on the subject.

Shel 
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax" 


> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi

> The issue, as I see it, is that Frank's photograph isn't yours, Shel.  
> When critiquing someone else's work, you cannot answer to what  
> *their* intent was, you can only respond to the photograph. For you,  
> the microphone ruins the shot, but that isn't true for Frank, I or  
> several other people, judging by the comments I've seen about it.
>
> When I critique someone else's work, sometimes I have to say "it  
> isn't to my taste" or "there are elements in this photograph that I  
> find too distracting", or similar, but to just state flatly that the  
> mic in this one "ruins the shot" is likely the wrong way to offer the  
> criticism.
>
> Godfrey
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2005, at 7:30 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> > Well, perhaps for you and some others.  However, when I make a shot  
> > and
> > something upsets or detracts from my intent, I consider the shot  
> > ruined.
> > That's my standard for my own work.  I didn't get the shot i  
> > wanted.  Maybe
> > I'm just more critical (at least about my work in general).  If you  
> > find
> > the mic in front of jenny's face acceptable, or an intended part of  
> > the
> > pic, then yes, ruined would be too strong a word.  If I tried to  
> > make a
> > similar shot, and was shooting in the same venue, I might not have  
> > even
> > snapped the shutter.
> >
> > We have a very different way of seeing and accepting a photograph.   
> > I'm
> > probably too critical most of the time, especially with my own work.
> > Example: took a pic of a girl on a bicycle.  After printing it I  
> > noticed
> > there was a piece of trash in the frame.  I never printed the pic  
> > again -
> > for years - until I learned how to delete the trash in Photoshop.
> >
> > So, FWIW, I'm being no more critical of the Pirate Jenny pix as I  
> > am of my
> > own.
> >
> > Shel
> > "You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
> >
> >
> >> [Original Message]
> >> From: frank theriault
> >
> >
> >>> But, Shel:  The shot is "ruined" by the mic?  I guess you're  
> >>> entitled
> >>> to your opinion, but "ruined"?  That's fairly strong language.
> >>
> >> BTW, I'm not in any way insulted or hurt by the use of the word.  I'm
> >> just surprised by your use of it.  Just don't want you to think that
> >> I'm taking anything personally <VBG>.
> >
> >


Reply via email to