Maybe this time size does matter. The original is only 12000x3000 and has lots of detail. It's overexposed, unsharp/hazy, has no foreground, no background, washed outed and over saturated colors by design. My idea was to catch the atmosphere in print. If you want to waste some 10 Mb bandwidth you could try the same shot with zoomifyer. http://www.bmt.tue.nl/pano/Panorama_strijperheg/Template.htm Jack
On 11/23/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/22/05, Jack Isidore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Really, is it that bad? I have a 1 meter wide print on my wall. My > > wife hates it :) > > > > Well, since you ask... > > It doesn't do much for me, either. It's the completely washed out sky > that bothers me. As well, in the version I'm looking at, there seems > to be several washed out/over exposed areas in the frame, especially > on the left, that don't add much IMHO. Not a lot of really sharp > detail, either. > > I wouldn't say that it's "that bad", but I would say that as > presented, on my 'puter screen, it doesn't work so well. It may be > that printed up real big and put on a wall, there's a world of > difference... > > -frank (trying to be honest) > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > >
