Kenneth Waller wrote: > > Looks fine to me. > My only nit is too much blank space on the RH side. > > Kenneth Waller
hmmm after telling Marnie dont change a thing - if I were nitpicky I'd join you in that - which is jsut to say, I guess , that I would ahve put less space on the right as well ann > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 6:11 PM > Subject: PESO - More Mom Hands > > > I've actually done about three sessions (maybe four, forget) of "Mom at > > 90." > > In the second session, I didn't seem to have enough ambient light or > > something > > and didn't think I got anything useable. > > > > But I was looking through them recently and decided one or two weren't > > bad. > > (I downloaded Irfanview and used its slideshow, which will do Canon > > RAWs -- > > probably pulling out the embedded jpgs. Splashed across the whole screen, > > I got a > > better view of some. Actually it's a very good way to preview photos. > > Thanks > > to those who have recommended it.) > > > > This was taken eight to nine months ago. > > > > I think the thumb could be better. Not quite in focus, or maybe it is in > > focus, but it has too much high light. Anyway, it looks a little too soft > > to me. > > Maybe it could be masked or something in PS CS. I tried darkening high > > lights, > > but that was not specific enough. > > > > Anyway, what do you think? Does it qualify to be included in a Mom hand > > gallery? > > > > Or is the thumb too distracting? And if so, what would you do to fix it > > up? > > > > http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/handclasp.htm > > > > TIA, Marnie aka Doe > >
