In a message dated 11/28/2005 9:32:00 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm all mulled out over film v digital. I'm a semi-pro (I guess) as print sales (web and brick 'n mortar) is not my only sours of income, but is my only overt effort at income. I can afford a casual attitude as to "work-flow", (habitually re-shoot, bracket, re-compose) covet my negs/slides and have no problem with the processing/scanning/CD ritual or their costs. Recently sold my MF gear and am at an photo investment crossroads. I visualize photo trips, wherein my motel relaxing, moose milk drinking evenings become a sleep-depriving delima of "delete?, save?, re-work?, re-shoot?...." Minor point? Maybe. I do like the cleaner overall look of many digitals, but am I in love..I'm really not sure. I realize no one can decide for me, but would appreciate your take.
Thanks, in advance, for commenting. Jack ======== Digital. Film, unfortunately, is going the way of the dodo bird. I bet you'll actually like it better than you think you might. It's still photography. And, NO, never delete any pictures. At some point you may relook at them and find one or two "good" ones you missed the first time around. Tastes change. Even our own taste about our own pictures. Marnie aka Doe
