Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Jack,
Not sure I understand your question.
A 6.1 Megapixel image can be represented in files of varying size
depending upon the pixel depth as well as how much and what type of
compression you apply. A 1.5M JPEG rendering might have substantial
compression artifacts, or it might have very little, depending upon
the image and the quality of the JPEG compressor. [ ... ]
There's no question that the original, not-JPEG, uncompressed image
will print better too, the difference is purely a matter of what you
consider as significant.
Ah, so someone mention that already. I didn't notice that (see my other
post.)
- Toralf
